Toshiba Satellite L855

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite L855  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 140
59% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 196
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.4
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 85 41 50 36 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 403
Write 303
Mixed 161
SusWrite 71.5
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 5.1
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 18.6
30% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 56%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
874GB free
Firmware: AX0A3M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 103
Write 97.3
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 63.1
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 SUPERTALENT02 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L855 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L855

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback