Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 864
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 75
Parallax 69.2
61% 72.9 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 67.1
56% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1546 1466 1472 1433 1088 960 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 1,695
Mixed 1,466
SusWrite 1,327
360% 1,602 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 62.5
211% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 964
736% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 269%
Great: 347%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
619GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 320 326 330 354 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 462
Write 408
Mixed 359
SusWrite 336
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 32.7
107% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 275
225% 320 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 121%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
121GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 1500 1492 1502 1497 1491 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 1,664
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 1,543
373% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.9
211% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 956
732% 997 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 282%
Great: 347%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 154 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 148
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 155
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
856GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 213 206 212 207 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 188
Mixed 100
SusWrite 208
127% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.6
348% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 34
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 38.4
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.2
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback