Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 184 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 357 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 190 164 153 149 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 476 Write 281 Mixed 314 SusWrite 170 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 30 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 1.2 38% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 128%
Wolf Aure 256GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 73GB free Firmware: S5FAM018 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 47 58 75 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 154 Write 115 Mixed 114 SusWrite 58.4 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 7 31% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 28.2 DQ Mixed 2.4 6% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 79.1 50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,194x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	989x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	936x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	227x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16