Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '17 at 13:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 263
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 507
67% 502 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1672 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 130
Parallax 117
96% 122 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 110
Splatting 105
87% 107 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 473
Write 170
Mixed 258
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 13.2
113% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 97.3
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 44.6
63% 113 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
775GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 164
Mixed 151
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.29
116% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B88B0NF-DI 1311 NT4GC64B88B0NF-DI 1311 NT4GC64B88B0NF-DI 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback