Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 118 55% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 232 26% 204 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 2106) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 540 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	3.16% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 3.9 3% 5.2 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 3.6 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.16% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1201A SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 379 361 380 386 391 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 408 Write 364 Mixed 319 SusWrite 365 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 13.1 66% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 33.7 72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	30x

RAM
16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBMicronBench 49%, 28 samples	6x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GBHynixBench 39%, 184 samples	2x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $277

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16