Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 13:23
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 93
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 374
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 16.6
14% 16.5 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 15.4
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 95 82 54 71 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 436
Write 271
Mixed 318
SusWrite 92.5
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 35.5
137% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 211
183% 269 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
186GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 74.9
Write 71.7
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 77.5
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
254GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 98 95 97 100 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 79.1
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 94.9
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 109%
Generic External 640GB
579GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 22.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 37.7
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback