Emachines eME732ZG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines eME732ZG  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines HM55_CP
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 96.3
45% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 134
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 0498) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 27 25 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 20.4
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 26.1
14% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 43%
Multiple Card Reader 4GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6 5.5 6 5 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 6.3
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.7
11% 9.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.6
78% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical eME732ZG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines eME732ZG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback