Lenovo 82N7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82N7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 867
91% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,145
71% 1,145 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3813) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.40.56.03
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 31.3
18% 24.9 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 22.8
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1211 1102 752 775 771 775 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 1,574
Mixed 1376
SusWrite 898
322% 1,437 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.6
214% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 995
653% 778 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 227%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.3
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 29.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82N7 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82N7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback