Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170 4,850 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU Socket - JIPR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 145 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 303 43% 318 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600 2,141 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2112) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 7.1 3% 4.37 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 431 Write 419 Mixed 340 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 54.4 175% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 354 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 189GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 102 103 102 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 102 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965432-068.A00LF 2x4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	1x

RAM
9965432-068.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 59 samples	1x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16