Acer Aspire E1-570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E1-570  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_CX
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 15:02
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 78
40% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 122
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0835) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.8
1% 2.57 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 318 131 122 129 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 436
Write 258
Mixed 347
SusWrite 197
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 24.2
88% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 156
132% 193 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 94%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
84GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 6.7
Write 95.6
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 104
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 17
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-570 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback