Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '17 at 02:37
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 261
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 842
83% 680 Pts
64-Core 1031
64% 1031 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 151
Parallax 128
113% 139 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 110
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
917GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 415
Mixed 428
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 32.7
152% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 43.5
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 124
106% 148 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
311GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 415
Mixed 426
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 35.1
163% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 43.4
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 123
106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,292
Write 1,264
Mixed 1,450
368% 1,669 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 57.1
248% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 34
131% 292 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 262%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
166GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 352
Mixed 358
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 27.9
148% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 46.2
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 88.8
83% 122 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 126%
WD Se 4TB-$177
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 124
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.25
122% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
878GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 110
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.28
93% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 77.7
120% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.24
76% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 43.7
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 22.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 122%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback