Lenovo 20T80005US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20T80005US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20T80005US
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 238
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 536
62% 482 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 507F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.26.05
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 19.5
12% 15.7 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.9
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV256HCHP-000MV 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV75M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 289 285 287 290 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 939
Write 282
Mixed 281
SusWrite 289
98% 448 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 36.6
147% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 928
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 394
347% 538 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 127%
Great: 138%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.7 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Read 11
Write 8.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 8.8
11% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20T80005US Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20T80005US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback