Huananzhi X79PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 141% UFO	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 130% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79PLUS (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '21 at 13:49
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 1,324 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 154 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 580 55% 458 Pts	64-Core 882 55% 882 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3896) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	193% Outstanding	Lighting 280 Reflection 259 Parallax 321 228% 286 fps	MRender 320 Gravity 238 Splatting 177 193% 245 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 3,975 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 57 79 41 48 33 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 252 Write 110 Mixed 215 SusWrite 48 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 24.8 93% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 39.2 DQ Mixed 7.4 32% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 85%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 43GB free Firmware: EXD7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,963 Write 1,581 Mixed 1224 352% 1,590 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 49.4 164% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 593 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 516 378% 500 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 101GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 94 92 94 90 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 110 Write 102 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 91.9 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 624GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 105 107 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 111 Write 119 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 105 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 41.1 126% 44.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79PLUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79PLUS

CPU
Xeon E5-2667 v2IntelBench 75%, 1,324 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	1x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x
1TB 1TBSSDBench 104%, 2,243 samples	1x
860 Pro 256GBSamsung $90Bench 109%, 12,565 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	1x
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	1x
M391B1G73QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 75%, 20 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369