TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung RC410/RC510/RC710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RC410/RC510/RC710  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RC410/RC510/RC710
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 93.2
41% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 150
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 40.8%
 Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A2) 730MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1
0% 1.1 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.42%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 112 120 127 124 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.1% Poor
Read 198
Write 120
Mixed 111
SusWrite 120
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 6.2
33% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 69.9
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 46.8
49% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 29.1%
 Great: 81%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
32GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.6 7.7 8.1 7.4 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.2
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 6.46%
 Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1B1674EU 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 0.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 18.6%
 Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical RC410/RC510/RC710 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC410/RC510/RC710

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples23x
Core i3 M 380Intel  $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples14x
Core i3 M 370Intel  $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples1x
GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples32x
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples8x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples2x
ssd 512GBBench 73%, 4,609 samples2x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung  $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples2x
RAM
AD73I1B1674EU 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 429 samples4x
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples3x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback