Galax H310M PLUS+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGalax H310M PLUS+  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX H310M PLUS+
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 01:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 720
76% 608 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Zotac(19DA 1527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 110
Parallax 114
94% 113 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 102
Splatting 94.2
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SWORDFISH 250GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S0311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 887 889 891 419 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 890
Mixed 1021
SusWrite 666
222% 995 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 59.8
208% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 638
500% 677 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 192%
Great: 233%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 108 107 110 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
70% Good
Read 136
Write 115
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 108
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB16GU2666.C8ET 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 12.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PLUS+ Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Galax H310M PLUS+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback