HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 117
52% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 418
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 10.9
7% 12 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 337 316 149 152 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 286
Write 310
Mixed 262
SusWrite 242
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 24.3
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 32.5
31% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9P1 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1778 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback