Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '21 at 18:19
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 245 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 385 56% 410 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
KNUP-SSD-240GB 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0719A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 92 102 145 162 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 448 Write 412 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 174 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 9.9 13% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 82%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 58GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 6.9 1.2 1.7 5.8 6.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 12.6 SusWrite 5.1 15% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 3.1 229% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8ET 1x8GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	394x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	344x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	118x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	85x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	130x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	49x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16