Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-774G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-774G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Hulk_SK
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 15:47
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 260
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Acer(1025 111A) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 11.8
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 9.1
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 510 311 309 313 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 844
Write 808
Mixed 749
SusWrite 465
161% 717 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 78.2
259% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 790
595% 803 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 179%
Great: 280%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
182GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 80 60 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 65
Write 67.6
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 70.6
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-774G Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-774G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback