Asrock H61M/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 14:48
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 352
45% 343 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 19
Parallax 14.6
14% 16.8 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.4
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 140 129 45 34 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 349
Write 345
Mixed 271
SusWrite 101
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 34.9
116% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 138
126% 193 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
104GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 89 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 86.4
Write 90.1
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 89.4
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
52GB free
Firmware: BF100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 69.2
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 67.4
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
7GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 51 62 57 63 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 50.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 61.7
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 9905471-097.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M/U3S3 Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M/U3S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback