Sony VPCF13C5E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSony VPCF13C5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101020
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 13:49
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 106
53% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 210
22% 180 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Sony(104D 907A) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5
Parallax 0.9
2% 3 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.6
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 213 219 215 216 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.9% Above average
Read 224
Write 212
Mixed 213
SusWrite 216
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 20.8
68% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 125%
Generic SA02G SD Card 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.7
6% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF13C5E Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF13C5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback