HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 193
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 744
66% 560 Pts
64-Core 1,687
104% 1,687 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 1485 1489 1490 1271 980 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 1,363
Mixed 591
SusWrite 1,365
285% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.9
195% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 732
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 614
457% 610 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 242%
Great: 292%
VK3840GFDKN 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 432 434 432 431 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 438
Mixed 373
SusWrite 432
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 38.1
139% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 308
240% 329 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1B1 Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.2% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback