PC NH5xAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPC NH5xAx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NH5xAx
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 704
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 104
Parallax 108
86% 106 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 84.9
83% 104 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1046 945 847 789 851 833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,254
Write 1,035
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 885
238% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 77.4
251% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 522
387% 511 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 205%
Great: 355%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
223GB free
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 385 379 346 384 365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 411
Write 374
Mixed 341
SusWrite 373
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 31
112% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 170
128% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 99%
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB
205GB free
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 121 290 135 135 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,553
Write 1,494
Mixed 1,136
SusWrite 268
248% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 78.9
262% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 370
287% 396 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 178%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C18S4 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 33.7
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 32
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5xAx Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: PC NH5xAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback