Lenovo 10M9A00HHC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10M9A00HHC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 15:52
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 620
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.4% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 29.4
25% 30.8 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 21.3
22% 28.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax PCIe SSD 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 1923 1911 1928 1961 2040 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,990
Write 1,861
Mixed 1,571
SusWrite 1,872
411% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 73.4
285% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 110
262% 547 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 315%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.2
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 26.5
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M9A00HHC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10M9A00HHC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback