ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450M-A
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 13:32
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 909
95% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 29.7
18% 24.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 21.6
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 2015 1255 214 195 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,618
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,708
SusWrite 970
361% 1,599 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 79.2
271% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,046
790% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 256%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$70
427GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 156 171 174 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 133
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 169
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 30
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO

System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback