Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 08:19
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 265
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 865
84% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.9% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 55.9
47% 59.8 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 51.2
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,372
Write 2,032
Mixed 1504
437% 1,970 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 89.5
299% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 1,088
784% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 264%
WDC WD10SPSX-08A6W 1TB
816GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 236
Mixed 94
35% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.1
9% 4.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 0.6
2% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 12.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback