Asus P5Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080820
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 08:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7300-$28
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 79.2
40% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 76.2
8-Core 80.8
10% 78.5 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E199) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6 Y080L0 82GB
8GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 30 27 32 34 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 27.3
24% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 32%
Maxtor 6 Y080L0 82GB
22GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 30 27 32 34 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 53.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 27.5
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 32%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
39GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 64 63 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 92
Write 96.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 62
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback