Medion MD34496/C991

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD34496/C991  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 21:28
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 857
86% 701 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 9520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.3% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 107
Parallax 115
92% 112 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 114
Splatting 99.5
98% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12C-128G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 124 134 130 127 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 850
Write 154
Mixed 132
SusWrite 131
68% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 27.7
120% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 114
104% 159 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
321GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 142 141 142 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 172
Write 181
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 141
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34496/C991 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Medion MD34496/C991

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback