Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 167 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 304 42% 309 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% EVGA(3842 2650) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.27% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 12.8 8% 11.3 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12 Splatting 10.7 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.27% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9C08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 216 214 230 224 234 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.1% Above average	Read 249 Write 233 Mixed 194 SusWrite 219 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 24.3 87% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 132 111% 161 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1067, 1067 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.5% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	116x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $155

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16