Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N470 191 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 45.7 1-Core 7.4 2-Core 12 18% 21.7 Pts	4-Core 12.2 8-Core 12.3 2% 12.2 Pts	64-Core 12.1 1% 12.1 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 27%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: H201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 219 Write 109 Mixed 143 SusWrite 107 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 23.7 74% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 62.9 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 59.2 44% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4542453231554538414653422D38472D4620 1x2GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 2.4 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16