TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ZBook 15 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 860F
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 20:04
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 137
2-Core 226
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 936
86% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,219
76% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 88.4%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
HP(103C 860F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7242
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.4% Good
Lighting 80.3
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 80.6
65% 82.8 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 81.4
71% 88.1 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 67.4%
 Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1393 1395 1473 1465 1394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 551
Write 634
Mixed 538
SusWrite 1,418
179% 785 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 62
202% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 635
474% 636 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑
This bench: 200%
 Great: 370%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
760GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1026 1037 1044 1085 1079 1046 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,481
Write 1,278
Mixed 962
SusWrite 1,053
268% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 58.4
199% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 271
292% 490 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 212%
 Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 64GB
3200, 3200, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 77.5%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ZBook 15 G6 Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G6

CPU
Core i7-9850HIntelBench 77%, 9,974 samples514x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples166x
Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples162x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples445x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples198x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples164x
SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples96x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples86x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples85x
RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples257x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples89x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GBMicronBench 88%, 2,294 samples28x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback