Dell Precision 7920 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 060K5C
Memory153.3 GB free of 160 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 106
47% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 425
36% 312 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 111
Parallax 103
87% 107 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 99.1
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PNY CS3030 1TB S
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3227 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2075 1292 1006 1002 1009 1005 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,020
Write 974
Mixed 735
SusWrite 1,232
223% 990 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 34.1
120% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 610
452% 605 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 180%
Great: 279%
Seagate ST6000NM0014 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: K0B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 220
Write 46.4
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 46.5
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST6000NM0014 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: K0E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 198
Write 45.1
Mixed 62
SusWrite 46.8
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST6000NM0014 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: K0B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 43 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 164
Write 41.7
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 43.4
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST6000NM0014 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: K0E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 195
Write 43.4
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 46.2
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS72404 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: NS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 129 133 152 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 136
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 159 159 157 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 129
Mixed 87
SusWrite 158
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A... 160GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 25
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7920 Tower Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback