Apple iMac20,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac20,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-CFF7D910A743CAAF
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 10:55
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 279
98% 176 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,149
102% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,592
98% 1,592 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Apple(106B 0218) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.50.32.02
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 112
59% 82.7 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 38.8
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 127.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 832
Write 1,219
Mixed 830
216% 960 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 19.2
68% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 500
456% 715 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
56GB free
Firmware: 0114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 147 146 146 146 138 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 268
Write 183
Mixed 200
SusWrite 146
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 13.4
48% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 65.3
DQ Write 55.6
DQ Mixed 13.7
23% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-VK 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac20,1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Apple iMac20,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback