Hp-pavilion VT565AA-ABG HPE-190a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion VT565AA-ABG HPE-190a  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 02:42
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 134
60% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 297
33% 261 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 41.9
0% 25.8 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 22.6
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 82 62 87 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 82.6
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VT565AA-ABG HPE-190a Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion VT565AA-ABG HPE-190a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback