Positivo VJF155

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemPositivo VJF155  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJF155
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 01:26
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 63%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 180
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 250
35% 258 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 2425) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1028 1122 1147 1125 945 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 870
Mixed 926
SusWrite 964
208% 922 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 73.1
244% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 701
528% 715 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 204%
Great: 295%
Sandisk SD8SBAT256G 256GB
13GB free
Firmware: Z2333000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 317
Mixed 240
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 13.8
88% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 86.3
92% 151 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ADDS1600W8G11-B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJF155 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback