HP h8-1110es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1110es  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory1.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 23:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 457
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 545
MSI(1462 2315) 3GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 5.8
5% 7.17 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 402 404 390 344 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 404
Write 372
Mixed 370
SusWrite 378
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 44.2
128% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.9
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 57.5
48% 68 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 125%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
768GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 28.2
37% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-511.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 9905403-442.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1110es Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1110es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback