EVGA 142-SX-E297

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 142-SX-E297  (all builds)
Memory115.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 21:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9800X-$545
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 194
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 809
77% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,239
77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
179% Outstanding
Lighting 255
Reflection 234
Parallax 263
208% 251 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 224
Splatting 165
180% 229 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 179%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 431 430 435 434 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 417
Mixed 314
SusWrite 431
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 40.5
148% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 276
230% 331 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 31.7
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 9.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 142-SX-E297 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: EVGA 142-SX-E297

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback