TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MINIPC VC66-C2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus MINIPC VC66-C2  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK VC66-C2
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200908
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 718
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 86.4%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 3.44%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW256G8 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 239 26 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 781
Write 450
Mixed 507
SusWrite 126
103% 466 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 65.6
247% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 164
170% 267 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 129%
 Great: 149%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
150GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 156 176 166 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 301
Write 118
Mixed 217
SusWrite 166
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 15.5
76% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 31.6
45% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 74%
Adata SD700X 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 390 350 371 372 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 375
Write 379
Mixed 349
SusWrite 374
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 79.8
76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FB CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 47GB
2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MINIPC VC66-C2 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus MINIPC VC66-C2

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel  $126Bench 84%, 71,804 samples4x
Core i3-10100Intel  $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples4x
Core i5-10500Intel  $140Bench 84%, 10,180 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples9x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples1x
SSD
SSDPEKNW256G8 256GBIntelBench 119%, 1,046 samples5x
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GBBench 112%, 7,301 samples1x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples1x
RAM
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 20GBAdataBench 51%, 91 samples3x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples1x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback