Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '21 at 13:05
Run Duration	304 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 150 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 443 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.7% Above average	Lighting 73.8 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 100 60% 80.6 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 79.9 Splatting 53 53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 513GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 359 354 359 359 361 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 407 Write 390 Mixed 337 SusWrite 359 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 41.8 136% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 38.4 DQ Write 91.8 DQ Mixed 52.1 43% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 26GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 152 150 148 144 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 395 Write 377 Mixed 319 SusWrite 174 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 38.3 124% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 93.2 DQ Mixed 50.6 43% 60 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 124%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 132GB free Firmware: FH100-05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 87 88 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 40 Write 55 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 88.3 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 141% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 665GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 81 83 84 81 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 67.4 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 80.1 97% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 90 90 92 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 65.2 Write 86.9 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 89.6 110% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 180% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 2,895 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.5% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 16.5 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 13.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	40x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	39x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	22x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	11x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16