HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10
Memory61 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7351P 16-Core
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 141
49% 88 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 450
38% 327 Pts
64-Core 1,583
98% 1,583 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 538 584 493 799 801 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 2273
Mixed 1,862
SusWrite 688
409% 1,828 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 46.1
208% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 742
546% 727 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 236%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 783 784 785 786 784 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 1,035
415% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 69.3
246% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 953
695% 911 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 277%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HPE P03052-191 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback