Medion Erazer X7851 MD60709

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X7851 MD60709  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670HSGM
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 169
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 557
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 123
Parallax 96.2
78% 105 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 104
80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zns256g NVMe TOSHIBA 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10410104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 681 812 391 391 389 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,146
Write 1,250
Mixed 1,194
SusWrite 508
231% 1,025 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 66
226% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 642
454% 590 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 172%
Great: 193%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
600GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 86 90 91 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42% Average
Read 54.5
Write 83.6
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 91.4
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 119 127 130 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 117
Write 102
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 123
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7851 MD60709 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Medion Erazer X7851 MD60709

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback