Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 776
82% 658 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 36.9
23% 34.2 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 25.8
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000L2 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QBXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 290 289 289 290 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 731
Write 293
Mixed 285
SusWrite 290
88% 400 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 38.5
170% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 405
334% 492 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 122%
Great: 153%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127
399GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 67 67 67 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 63.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 63.9
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M8Z2933C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 24.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback