LG 15ND540-UX7DK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLG 15ND540-UX7DK  (all builds)
MotherboardLG White Tip Mountain
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 11:43
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 140
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 327
33% 269 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1854 0214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 4.3
2% 5.77 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM01B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 44 38 35 32 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 267
Write 138
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 41.4
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 12
61% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 57
70% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 76%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
119GB free
Firmware: AX005L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 82 82 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 75.6
Write 60.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 80.5
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15ND540-UX7DK Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: LG 15ND540-UX7DK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback