Asus V220IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus V220IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V220IC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 21:42
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
BGA1356, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 143
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 221
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 930M
Asus(1043 86B3) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10
Parallax 10.4
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 12
Splatting 8
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 120G 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2011052P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 269 253 155 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 457
Write 296
Mixed 308
SusWrite 196
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 12.1
104% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 19.2
63% 133 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V220IC Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V220IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback