Lenovo 90G8004AMB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90G8004AMB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36C5
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 532
58% 459 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
MSI(1462 3511) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.55
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 34.7
26% 32.7 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 22.2
24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 169 151 165 180 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1124
Write 1,182
Mixed 790
SusWrite 202
184% 825 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 55.1
198% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 48.6
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 537
381% 459 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 137%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 134 131 134 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 68.9
Write 105
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 132
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90G8004AMB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90G8004AMB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback