HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$103
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 603
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8643) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.20.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 30.9
19% 23.4 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 15.9
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 369 362 360 339 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,026
Write 561
Mixed 794
SusWrite 362
153% 685 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.9
190% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 561
441% 604 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 150%
Great: 164%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
517GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 113 115 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67% Good
Read 122
Write 104
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 112
65% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67%
Great: 75%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
646GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 67 67 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 88.9
Write 96
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 67.8
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
260GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 67
Write 69.8
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 65.7
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 131 131 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 97.5
Write 126
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 130
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.1
165% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 68%
Apple iPod 16GB
1GB free, PID 1263
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.8 4.3 6.4 4.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 7.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.5
9% 6.98 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$67
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F0xxx Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback