Sony SVF15218SNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSony SVF15218SNB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 15:46
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 96.2
49% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 141
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Sony(104D 90B8) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 9.1
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001CBL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 318 306 292 315 343 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 352
Write 338
Mixed 305
SusWrite 314
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 19.4
62% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 187
145% 196 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVF15218SNB Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVF15218SNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $32
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback