Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 243%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 02:08
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 285
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1024
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,984
123% 1,984 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$835
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Lighting 355
Reflection 309
Parallax 388
289% 350 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 273
Splatting 196
222% 283 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 233%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Timetec 35TTFP6PCIE-2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42BBT9BA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1751 1134 1111 1084 1109 1093 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,435
Write 1892
Mixed 1,562
SusWrite 1,214
397% 1,776 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.7
201% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,185
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 910
688% 934 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 276%
Great: 345%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 225 231 230 232 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 207
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 230
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.2
200% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 126%
Great: 130%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
570GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 87 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 63.6
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 87.3
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 67%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 150 158 159 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 158
Mixed 110
SusWrite 156
196% 144 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.9
366% 4.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 5.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
230% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 99%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 97.4
Write 74.8
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 98
108% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 52%
General UDisk 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.3 5.7 5.4 5.3 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 3
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 5.3
6% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Chun Well Holding Limited CL16-18-18 D4-3000 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 28.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback