Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory15.2 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration456 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 125
58% 93 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 336
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 40.3
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 32
Splatting 26.5
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 98 79 92 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 217
Write 202
Mixed 180
SusWrite 95
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 18.6
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 29.1
27% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
261GB free
Firmware: MF8OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 154
Write 164
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 97.5
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MF8OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 102 85 93 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 97.9
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 120GB
91GB free, PID 5070
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 24.4
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 27.1
34% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 78%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 125GB
113GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 32
Write 18.9
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 14.5
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
128% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback