MSI MS-ACB31

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-ACB311
MotherboardMSI MS-ACB31  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140710
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 09:38
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 148
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 236
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 ACB3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3431
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 6.3
4% 9.3 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMSA370 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 65 52 54 49 59 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.8% Very poor
Read 178
Write 60.1
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 54.7
21% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.9
7% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 78%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
682GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 61 50 56 47 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 126
Write 113
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 53.2
57% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-ACB31 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-ACB31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback