MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1632 x 918 - 32 Bit cores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 05:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 263
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 797
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 2400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 60
Parallax 53.2
47% 57.1 fps
MRender 51.1
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 48.3
41% 50.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 485 339 352 380 401 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,646
Write 1,120
Mixed 914
SusWrite 396
226% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 27
212% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 585
DQ Mixed 106
185% 354 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 172%
Great: 234%
Patriot Burst Elite 960GB
320GB free
Firmware: T0917A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 429 422 424 427 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 362
Mixed 373
SusWrite 430
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 30.1
140% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 43.5
85% 165 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 102%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
362GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 125
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
563GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 96 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 96
Write 90.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 96.4
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DDR4 8GB 2666MHz 029E CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback